Book a Session

History of Psychiatry

The Shed Where Lithium Was Found

Dr. Shaurya Garg, MD Psychiatry (AIIMS New Delhi) · 6 min read

In 1948 a psychiatrist working alone in a disused kitchen outside Melbourne set out to prove that mania was caused by a toxin in the urine. He was wrong about that. Along the way he reached for a lithium salt because it was the only form of uric acid that would dissolve, and psychiatry acquired its first genuinely effective treatment.

In short

  • Who. John Cade, an Australian psychiatrist working alone in a disused kitchen at a hospital outside Melbourne, with no budget and no assistants.
  • The hypothesis was wrong. He believed mania was caused by a toxin excreted in urine. It is not.
  • The accident. He reached for lithium urate only because it was the most soluble urate salt available. The lithium, not the urate, was what mattered.
  • Published September 1949 in the Medical Journal of Australia, describing ten patients with mania. The first patient recovered, then later died of lithium toxicity, before blood levels could be measured.
  • It took twenty-one years to reach United States approval, partly because lithium cannot be patented, so nobody had a reason to promote it.
  • Still first-line today for long-term treatment of bipolar disorder, with regular blood, kidney and thyroid monitoring.

A Doctor With No Laboratory

Melbourne, 1948, in a disused kitchen

John Cade was thirty-six when he came home from the war. He had spent three and a half years as a prisoner in Changi after the fall of Singapore, working as a camp doctor, watching several thousand men closely and under conditions no ethics committee would ever approve. What he took from it was a conviction: that some of the mental disturbance he saw was physical in origin, and that the psychiatry of his day, which had almost nothing to offer people with mania, was looking in the wrong place.

In 1948 he was Senior Medical Officer at the Repatriation Mental Hospital at Bundoora, on the outskirts of Melbourne. He had no research budget, no assistants and no laboratory. He worked in a disused kitchen on the hospital grounds, in his own time, keeping his experimental animals nearby and his reagents in a small refrigerator.

The Wrong Hypothesis

A toxin in the urine, and a great many guinea pigs

Cade’s theory was that mania was caused by an excess of some substance the body produced, and that depression was a deficiency of the same thing. If such a substance existed, it should be excreted. So he collected urine from patients with mania, from patients with depression and schizophrenia, and from healthy people, and injected it into the abdomens of guinea pigs.

Urine from patients with mania killed the guinea pigs at lower volumes than urine from anyone else. Encouraged, Cade set about finding the culprit. Urea turned out to be the lethal component, but urea concentration did not differ between the groups, which was awkward. He wondered whether uric acid modified urea’s toxicity, and here he hit a mundane practical problem. Uric acid is barely soluble in water.

To get it into solution he needed a soluble urate salt. The most soluble one available to him was lithium urate. He used it because it dissolved.

The chain of reasoning that led to lithium Five steps, from urine to urea to uric acid to lithium urate to lithium. The fourth step is marked as the accident: the lithium salt was chosen only because it dissolved. Urine from patients with mania More toxic to guinea pigs than anyone else’s Urea The lethal part, but no different between groups Uric acid Might change urea’s toxicity. Barely dissolves Lithium urate Chosen only because it dissolved Lithium The animals went quiet. Nobody was looking for that
Every step in the chain was reasoned. The step that mattered was not reasoned at all.

The Accident

Animals that were calm, not asleep

The guinea pigs given lithium urate did not die as expected. Cade then tested lithium carbonate on its own, and observed something he had not gone looking for. The animals became placid. Turned on their backs, they lay still and looked back at him rather than righting themselves in a panic. They were not unconscious. They were, in the word he used, unresponsive.

A modern reader should be sceptical here, and Cade’s later reviewers have been. Lithium in those doses probably made the animals generally unwell rather than specifically calm, and his reasoning about urea and uric acid was wrong from beginning to end. This is one of the clearer cases in medicine of the right conclusion reached through the wrong argument.

He took lithium citrate and lithium carbonate himself first, for some weeks, to check that the doses were tolerable. Then he gave it to patients.

Ten Patients

The paper that almost nobody read

Cade treated ten patients with mania, six with schizophrenia and three with melancholia. Lithium did nothing useful for the last two groups. In mania the effect was unmistakable.

His first patient was a man in his fifties who had been in a state of chronic manic excitement for years and was regarded as a permanent resident of the hospital. Within three weeks he was settled. Within a few months he had left, gone home and returned to his old job. Cade published the results in the Medical Journal of Australia in September 1949, under the title Lithium Salts in the Treatment of Psychotic Excitement. It was five pages long, single-authored, and described one of the most consequential findings in the history of psychiatry.

The story does not end tidily. That first patient later stopped his lithium, relapsed, was restarted, and died of lithium toxicity. There was no way to measure blood lithium levels at the time. Cade was badly shaken and stepped back from the work. The narrow gap between a helpful dose and a dangerous one, which the advertisement in the fine print of the 1980s lithium page was still warning prescribers about thirty years later, was discovered the hard way, by the first person ever treated.

Twenty Lost Years

Why the discovery sat on a shelf

The timing could hardly have been worse. In the same year, 1949, lithium chloride was being sold in the United States as a salt substitute for patients on low-sodium diets, mostly people with heart disease. Several were poisoned, and some died. Lithium acquired a reputation as a dangerous industrial chemical almost exactly as Cade was reporting that it was a treatment.

It did not help that the finding came from a single doctor, in a small hospital, in a journal read almost entirely within Australia, describing an uncontrolled series of ten patients, using a naturally occurring salt that nobody could patent and therefore nobody had a commercial reason to promote.

What rescued it was careful work by Mogens Schou and colleagues in Denmark, who ran placebo-controlled trials through the 1950s and later established that lithium prevented episodes rather than merely treating them. Blood level monitoring made safe dosing possible. The United States did not approve lithium for mania until 1970, twenty-one years after Cade’s paper.

What Lithium Turned Out To Be

Still here, seventy-five years on

Lithium remains a first-line long-term treatment for bipolar disorder in essentially every major guideline. Newer medicines have arrived, some of them easier to use, and none has clearly displaced it for preventing relapse. It needs blood tests, attention to kidney and thyroid function, care in pregnancy and caution with dehydration and with several common drugs. Prescribed and monitored properly, it is one of the more reliably effective treatments in medicine. It is also worth separating the monitoring a medicine needs from the question of whether it is addictive, which the guide to dependence on psychiatric medication takes apart properly.

Its reputation for reducing suicide risk is more contested than is usually admitted. Meta-analyses of older randomised trials and a considerable body of observational data point that way, but a large randomised trial in United States veterans, reported in 2022, did not find the benefit and was stopped early. It is a genuinely open question, and it is worth knowing that it is open.

As for the trivia that everyone reaches for: 7 Up did contain lithium citrate when it was launched in 1929, and the lithium was gone by around 1950. Lithia spring waters were sold for decades on vague promises about nerves and gout. The popular version of that story is tidier than the record, but the outline is true. A salt that had been drifting around the margins of medicine for a century turned out to work, and it was found by a man in a converted kitchen who was chasing the wrong idea.

If you are considering or already taking lithium

Lithium is a good treatment that requires proper monitoring, and the decisions around starting it, staying on it and stopping it deserve unhurried discussion rather than a rushed one. If you have questions about your own treatment, they are best answered by the doctor who knows your history.

Dr. Shaurya Garg, MD Psychiatry (AIIMS New Delhi), offers structured psychiatric assessment and mood disorder care, with fees listed transparently. Consultations are available online across India and in person in New Delhi.

If you are in crisis: if you or someone with you is having thoughts of self-harm or suicide, please do not wait for an appointment. Go to your nearest hospital emergency department, or call Tele-MANAS at 14416, India's national mental health helpline, available 24×7. This website is not a substitute for emergency care.
Sources and further reading
Common questions
Who discovered lithium as a psychiatric treatment?

John Cade, an Australian psychiatrist working at the Repatriation Mental Hospital in Bundoora, outside Melbourne. He published his findings in the Medical Journal of Australia in September 1949, after treating ten patients with mania.

Was lithium discovered by accident?

Substantially, yes. Cade's hypothesis, that mania was caused by a toxin excreted in urine, was wrong. He used lithium urate only because it was the most soluble urate salt available, and then noticed that lithium itself changed the animals' behaviour.

Why did it take so long for lithium to be adopted?

Several reasons at once. Lithium chloride poisoned patients using it as a salt substitute in 1949, giving the element a dangerous reputation. Cade's series was small and uncontrolled, published in a journal with limited international reach. And lithium is a naturally occurring salt that cannot be patented, so no company had a commercial reason to promote it. The United States approved it in 1970.

Is lithium still used today?

Yes. It remains a first-line long-term treatment for bipolar disorder in major guidelines, and no newer medicine has clearly displaced it for preventing relapse. It requires regular blood tests and monitoring of kidney and thyroid function.

Does lithium reduce suicide risk?

This is less settled than it is often presented. Meta-analyses of older randomised trials and a large body of observational data suggest it does. A large randomised trial in United States veterans, published in 2022, did not find a benefit and was stopped early. The question remains genuinely open.

Book a Consultation →